(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 9469-9481 | Article Number: ijese.2016.670
Published Online: October 24, 2016
Abstract
In this study, the purpose is examining the reviews released on augmented reality applications in education, merging the results obtained in the studies that are independent from each other, and providing a new viewpoint for the studies that will be conducted in the future. The meta-analysis method has been used in the study. 15 out of 171 reviews, whose effect size of the data may be calculated, and released between the years 2005 and 2015 have been included in the meta analytic effect size analysis. The reviews were intended to examine the efficiency of augmented reality applications in education and were selected after scanning the SCI and SSCI Indices. The names and the abstracts of the reviews were taken as bases in the classifying according to the target audience and subjects. It was determined as a conclusion in the study that the average effect size of the augmented reality applications in education was ES=0.677. In other words, it was determined that the applications performed by using the augmented reality technology in education had a positive effects on students, and that this effect was at medium level that could not be underestimated according to Thalheimer and Cook Classification. At the end of the study, the development of the augmented reality applications used in education, the missing points in present studies, and the new study areas are mentioned.
Keywords: Augmented reality, meta-analysis, education, effectiveness.
References
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. West Sussex-UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
*Cai, S., Chiang, F. K., & Wang, X. (2013). Using the augmented reality 3D technique for a convex imaging experiment in a physics course. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(4), 856-865.
Cai, S., Wang, X., & Chiang, F. K. (2014). A case study of augmented reality simulation system application in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 31-40.
Card, N. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York: The Guilford Press.
*Chen, C. M., & Tsai, Y. N. (2012). Interactive augmented reality system for enhancing library instruction in elementary schools. Computers & Education, 59(2), 638-652.
Chiang, T. H., Yang, S. J., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). An augmented reality-based mobile learning system to improve students’ learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352-365.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2 nd. edition). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Russell Sage Publication.
Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
Çarkungöz, E., & Ediz, B., (2009). Meta Analizi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(1), 33-37.
Dinçer, S. (2013). Meta-analize giriş. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Dinçer, S. (2014). Eğitim bilimlerinde uygulamalı meta-analiz. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Dinçer, S. (2015). Türkiye’de yapılan bilgisayar destekli öğretimin öğrenci başarısına etkisi ve diğer ülkelerle karşılaştırılması: Bir meta-analiz çalışması. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 12(1), 99-118.
Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M. B., ve Kloos, C. D. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students' motivation for a visual art course. Computers &Education, 68, 586–596.
Dünser, A., Steinbügl, K., Kaufmann, H., & Glück, J. (2006). Virtual and augmented reality as spatial ability training tools. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCHI New Zealand chapter's international conference on computer-human interaction: design centered HCI (pp. 125-132). ACM.
Ellis, P. D. (2012). The essential guide to effect sizes. Cambridge-UK: Cambridge University.
*Ferrer-Torregrosa, J., Torralba, J., Jimenez, M. A., García, S., & Barcia, J. M. (2015). ARBOOK: development and assessment of a tool based on augmented reality for anatomy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 119-124.
Glasgow, N. A. (1997). New curriculum for new times: a guide to student-centered, problem-based learning. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
Gözüyeşil, E., & Dikici, A. (2014). Beyin temelli öğrenmenin akademik başarıya etkisi: Bir meta-analiz çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(2), 1-20. DOI: 10.12738/estp.2014.2.2103
*Hsiao, K. F. (2013). Using augmented reality for students’ health-case of combining educational learning with standard fitness. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 64(2), 407-421
*Hsiao, K. F., Chen, N. S., & Huang, S. Y. (2012). Learning while exercising for science education in augmented reality among adolescents. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(4), 331-349.
*Ibáñez, M. B., Di Serio, A., Villarán, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2014). Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: Impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness. Computers & Education, 71, 1-13.
*Jee, H. K., Lim, S., Youn, J., & Lee, J. (2014). An augmented reality-based authoring tool for e-learning applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 68(2), 225-235.
Kaufmann H., & Schmalstieg, D. (2003). Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality. Computers & Graphics, 27 (3), 339-345.
*Ke, F., & Hsu, Y. C. (2015). Mobile augmented-reality artifact creation as a component of mobile computer-supported collaborative learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 26, 33-41.
Kış, A., & Konan, N. (2014). Okul müdürlerinin öğretimsel liderlik davranışlarını gösterme düzeylerine ilişkin sınıf ve branş öğretmenlerinin görüşleri: Bir meta-analiz. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 359-374.
Klopfer, E., & Yoon, S. (2004). Developing games and simulations for today and tomorrow’s tech savvy youth. TechTrends, 49(3), 41-49
Lai, Y.-S. & Hsu, J.-M. (2011). Development trend analysis of augmented reality system in educational applications. International Conference on Electrical and Control Engineering, 6527-6531.
Lin, C. Y., & Chang, Y. M. (2015). Interactive augmented reality using Scratch 2.0 to improve physical activities for children with developmental disabilities. Research in developmental disabilities, 37, 1-8.
*Lin, T. J., Duh, H. B. L., Li, N., Wang, H. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). An investigation of learners' collaborative knowledge construction performances and behavior patterns in an augmented reality simulation system. Computers & Education, 68, 314-321.
Lipsey, M.W., & Wilson, D.B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Luckin, R., & Fraser, D. S. (2011). Limitless or pointless? An evaluation of augmented reality technology in the school and home. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(5), 510-524.
*Martín-Gutierrez, J. M., & Fernandez, M. D. M. (2014). Applying augmented reality in engineering education to improve academic performance & student motivation. International journal of engineering education, 30 (3), 625-635.
*Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Saorín, J. L., Contero, M., Alcañiz, M., Pérez-López, D. C., & Ortega, M. (2010). Design and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students. Computers & Graphics, 34(1), 77-91.
Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students' learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29-40.
New Media Consortium Horizon Report Higher Education Edition. (2012). http://www.nmc.org/publications/horizon-report-2012-higher-ed-edition / Accessed 14.03.15
Özcan, Ş., & Bakioğlu, A. (2010). Bir meta analitik etki analizi: Okul yöneticilerinin hizmetiçi eğitim almalarının göreve etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(38), 201-212.
Seferoğlu, S. S. (2007). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal tasarımı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Shelton, B. E., & Hedley, N. R. (2002). Using augmented reality for teaching earth-sun relationship to undergraduate geography students. The First IEEE International Augmented Reality Toolkit Workshop (pp. 1-8). Darmstadt, Germany: IEEE.
Singhal, S., Bagga, S., Goyal, P., & Saxena, V. (2012). Augmented chemistry: Interactive education system. International Journal of Computer Applications, 49(15), 1-5.
*Sommerauer, P., & Müller, O. (2014). Augmented reality in informal learning environments: A field experiment in a mathematics exhibition. Computers & Education, 79, 59-68.
Squire, K. D., & Jan, M. (2007). Mad City Mystery: Developing scientific argumentation skills with a place--‐based augmented reality game on handheld computers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 5-29.
Tavil, Y. Z., & Karasu, N. (2013). Aile eğitim çalışmaları: Bir gözden geçirme ve meta-analiz örneği. Eğitim ve Bilim Dergisi, 38(168), 85-95.
Thalheimer, W., & Cook, S. (2002). How to calculate effect sizes from published research articles: A simplified methodology. http://work-learning.com/effect_sizes.htm / Accessed 28.07.15.
Üstün, U. (2012). To what extent is problem-based learning effective as compared to traditional teaching in science education? A meta-analysis study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. METU. Ankara.
Üstün, U., & Eryılmaz, A. (2014). Etkili araştırma sentezleri yapabilmek için bir araştırma yöntemi: Meta-analiz. Egitim ve Bilim Dergisi, 39 (174), 1-32. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.3379.
Wecker, C., & Fischer, F. (2014). Where is the evidence? A meta-analysis on the role of argumentation for the acquisition of domain-specific knowledge in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 75, 218-228.
*Wei, X., Weng, D., Liu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2015). Teaching based on augmented reality for a technical creative design course. Computers & Education, 81, 221-234.
Wu, H.-K., Lee, S. W.-Y., Chang, H.-Y., & Liang, J.-C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41- 49.
Wu, W. H., Wu, Y. C. J., Chen, C. Y., Kao, H. Y., Lin, C. H., & Huang, S. H. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 59(2), 817-827.
Yuen, S.; Yaoyuneyong, G., & Johnson, E. (2011). Augmented reality: An overview and five directions for AR in education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 4(1), 119- 140.
*Zhang, J., Sung, Y. T., Hou, H. T., & Chang, K. E. (2014). The development and evaluation of an augmented reality-based armillary sphere for astronomical observation instruction. Computers & Education, 73, 178-188.