Russian Education in the Context of the Third Generation Universities` Discourse: Employers’ Evaluation

APA 6th edition
In-text: (Maximova, Belyaev, Laukart-Gorbacheva, Nagmatullina & Hamzina, 2016)
Your Bibliography: Maximova, O., Belyaev, V., Laukart-Gorbacheva, O., Nagmatullina, L. & Hamzina, G. (2016). Russian Education in the Context of the Third Generation Universities` Discourse: Employers’ Evaluation. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(16), 9101-9112.

Harvard
In-text: (Maximova, Belyaev, Laukart-Gorbacheva, Nagmatullina and Hamzina, 2016)
Your Bibliography: Maximova, O., Belyaev, V., Laukart-Gorbacheva, O., Nagmatullina, L. and Hamzina, G. (2016). Russian Education in the Context of the Third Generation Universities` Discourse: Employers’ Evaluation. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(16), pp. 9101-9112.

Chicago 16th edition
In-text: (Maximova, Belyaev, Laukart-Gorbacheva, Nagmatullina and Hamzina 2016)
Your Bibliography: Maximova, Olga, Vladimir Belyaev, Olga Laukart-Gorbacheva, Lyudmila Nagmatullina and Guzel Hamzina (2016). "Russian Education in the Context of the Third Generation Universities` Discourse: Employers’ Evaluation". International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 11 (16):9101-9112.

Abstract

Urgent problems of modernization of the Russian system of higher education in the context of the discourse of the third generation universities were revealed on the basis of the expert survey of employers (heads of personnel departments of large industrial enterprises of the city of Kazan and the Republic of Tatarstan) within research project “Strategy development of socio-economic development of the Republic of Tatarstan for the period till 2030". These include: insufficient level of professional skills and competencies of graduates in recent decades; decrease in motivation of young specialists in employment and work in the industrial sector; formal activities aimed at enhancing interaction between universities and companies due to the lack of financial and material resources. To improve the quality of young specialists` training, experts offered recommendations such as improving the system of practical training of students, modernization of the educational process through the use of new educational technologies and active involvement of employers into the development of educational plans and programs, improvement of the quality of teaching university staff.

Keywords: Higher education, third generation university, modernization of education, graduates, employers, expert interviews

References

Baudrillard, J. (1974). La Société de Consommation: Ses Mythes, Ses Structures. Paris: Gallimard, 318 p.

Bauman, Z. (2001). The Individualized Society. Cambridge: Polity, 272 p.

Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage, 272 p.

Bell, D. (1973) The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: a Venture of Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books, 507 p.

Castells, M. & Himanen, P. (2004). The Information Society and the Welfare State: The Finnish Model. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 216 p.

Clark, B. (1998) Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organization Pathways of Transformation. Guildford: Pergamon, 163 p.

Dahrendorf, R. (1979). Life Chances. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 272 p.

Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation In Action. London: Routledge, 180 p.

Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 188 p.

Husen, T. (1974). The Learning Society. London: Methuen, 268 p.

Hutchins, R.M. (1968). The Learning Society. Santa Barbara: Praeger, 461 p.

Inkeles, A. (1976). A Model of the Modern Man: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. In C.E. Black (Eds.). Comparative Modernization. New York: Free Press, 320-348.

Kumar, K. (1988). The Rise of Modern Society: Aspect of the Social and Political Development of the West. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 338 p.

Laszlo, E. (1991). The Age of Bifurcation: Understanding the Changing World. Philadelphia: Gordon & Breach, 126 p.

Laukart-Gorbacheva, O.V. & Maksimova, O.A. (2015). Problems of domestic education in the evaluation of young generation. Herald of Economics, Law and Sociology, 4, 316-321.

Levy, M. (1966). Modernization and the Structure of Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 855 p.

Luhmann, N. (1991). Soziologie des Risikos. Berlin: de Gruyter, 252 p.

Maksimova, O.A. & Hamzina K.A. (2015). Adaptation of management of university education to the conditions of the Bologna Declaration. Herald of Kazan National Research Technical University named after A.N. Tupolev – KAI (KNRTU-KAI), 71, 213-234.

Mansell, R. (1998). Knowledge Societies: Information Technology for Sustainable Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 323 p.

Masuda, Y. (1983). The Information Society as Postindustrial Society. Washington: World Future Society, 171 p.

Naisbitt, J. & Aburdene, P. (1990). Megatrends 2000: The New Directions for the 1990's. New York: William Morrow, 384 p.

Slaughter, S. & Leslie, L.L. (1997). Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 276 p.

Ropke, J. (1998). The Entrepreneurial University: Innovation, Academic Knowledge Creation and Regional Development in a Globalized Economy. Direct access: http://www.wiwi.unimarburg.de/Lehrstuehle/VWL/Witheo3/documents/entreuni.pdf

Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave. London: Bantam Books, 448 p.

Wissema, J.G. (2009). Towards the Third Generation University: Managing the University in Transition. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 252 p.