Dependence of the Teacher's Overall Work Capacity on the Professional Expertise

APA 6th edition
In-text: (Barmin, Petrov, Petrov & Bulaeva, 2016)
Your Bibliography: Barmin, N., Petrov, Y., Petrov, A. & Bulaeva, M. (2016). Dependence of the Teacher's Overall Work Capacity on the Professional Expertise. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(16), 9079-9091.

Harvard
In-text: (Barmin, Petrov, Petrov and Bulaeva, 2016)
Your Bibliography: Barmin, N., Petrov, Y., Petrov, A. and Bulaeva, M. (2016). Dependence of the Teacher's Overall Work Capacity on the Professional Expertise. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(16), pp. 9079-9091.

Chicago 16th edition
In-text: (Barmin, Petrov, Petrov and Bulaeva 2016)
Your Bibliography: Barmin, Nikolay, Yuri Petrov, Aleksey Petrov and Marina Bulaeva (2016). "Dependence of the Teacher's Overall Work Capacity on the Professional Expertise". International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 11 (16):9079-9091.

Abstract

The topicality of the research is conditioned by the social and pedagogic, scientific and theoretical, and scientific and methodical aspects. With regard to this, the paper is aimed at revealing the dependence of the teacher's overall work capacity on the development of his/her professional expertise. The leading methods in studying this problem are theoretical and experimental ones that allow viewing the problem comprehensively. The paper presents the ways of evaluation of indices characterizing the condition of physiological, psychological and emotional components of the functional system that determine the level of overall work capacity of teachers and development of their professional expertise. The materials of the paper are of practical value for the heads of professional education organizations designing the pedagogues' professional development.

Keywords: Development, professional expertise, work capacity, open system, quality

References

Abulhanova-Slavskaya, K.A. (1980). Activity and personality psychology. Moscow: Science, 334 p.

Anohin, P.K. (1973). Fundamental questions of the general theory of functional systems. In: Principles of the systemic organization of functions. Moscow: Education, 5-61.

Aristotle (1984). Compositions. Moscow: Thought, 830p.

Barmin, N.Yu. (2010). Adult Education in the new economy: social and philosophical analysis: monograph. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod Institute of Education Development, 155 p.

Bespalko, V.P. (1998). Personalized education. Pedagogy, 2, 12-17.

Bondarevskaya, E.V. (2000). Theory and practice of student-centered education. Rostov-on-Don: RSPU Press, 352 p.

Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L. & Cocking, R.R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington: National Academy Press, 12-18.

Bulaeva, M.N. & Petrov, Yu.N. (2012). Manager of engineering and teacher education in the administrative and managerial activities. Nizhny Novgorod: NSPU, 195 p.

Darling-Hammond, L. & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and be Able to Do. San-Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 339 p.

Domer, P. (1978). Self-reflection and problem-solving. In: Human and artificial intelligence. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, 101 - 107.

Erikson, E. & Erikson, J. (1997). The life cycle completed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 134 p.

Froumin, I. (2015). National-Regional Relationships in Federal Higher Education Systems: The case of Russian Federation. Higher education forum Hiroshima University, 12, 77-94.

Gibbons, H. (2002). Electronic Technology Provides a New Methodology for Teaching and Testing. Journal of Legal Education, 52, 145-158.

Heathon, J.B. (1997). Classroom Testing. London: Longman, 127 p.

Knowles, M.S., Holton, E.E. & Swanson, R.A. (2005). The Adult Learner: The Definitive Class in Adult Education and Human Resource Development. London: Butterworth Heinemann, 378 p.

Kulyutkin, Yu.N. & Mushtavinskaya, I.V. (2002). Educational Technology and pedagogical reflection. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg SUPM, 48 p.

Letter of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation N 03-339 «Methods of assessing the level of teachers` qualification" (2010). Direct access: http://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/55070066/

Loksha, O.M. (2002). Communicative approach to the development of the sphere of self-regulation of students in the learning process: PhD Thesis. Kaliningrad, 206 p.

Lorin, W. Anderson, D., Krathwohl, R. & Bloom, B.S. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. London: Longman, 352 р.

Noak, H. (1987). Concepts of health and health promotion. Measurements in Health promotion and Protection. Direct access: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/156100/-WA525ES.pdf

Order, N 1152 of the Ministry of Education of Nizhny Novgorod region "On the organization of the regional innovative network educational project "Model of professional educational organization as an open educational system" (2014). Direct access: http://www.niro.nnov.ru/?id=23040

Petrov, Yu.N., Alikperov, F.G., Egorova, T.E. & Sedyh, M.M. (2009). A method of evaluating measurement of the overall health of the person. Russian patent №2354282.

Polat, E.S. (2007). Modern pedagogical and information technologies in the education system: teaching guide. Moscow: Academy, 368 p.

Sechenov, I.M. (1956). Selected Works. Physiology of the Nervous System. Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the USSR Press, 538 p.

Smith, D. (2008). Assess. Students with Portfolio. Types of portfolios. Education Research Consumer Guide, 3, 232-138.