(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 8900-8910 | Article Number: ijese.2016.663
Published Online: October 23, 2016
Abstract
The relevance of the researched problem is connected with the high level of economic inequality in Russia. The article goal is to show that the current Russian institutional system is not directed to decrease the economic inequality but on the contrary it continues to make and deepen it. The leading approach to study of this problem is the analysis of social institutes, formal and informal regulations which promote keeping on economic inequality in the country. The results of sociological surveys of the Russian research centers confirm sharpness of this problem. The economic inequality laid its foundation due to the transition to the market in the period of privatization and price liberalization in the 90-ies of XX century. Among the factors which aggravate the problem of economic inequality in contemporary Russia there is a rent-seeking behavior of major market players and regressive tax system. The materials can be used to assess the prospects and consequences of large-scale reforms in the transition economies. The experience of the Russian market transformation is useful not only for developing countries but for all the rest of the world.
Keywords: Social institutes, inequality, social justice, equal opportunities, poverty, rent-seeking, regressive taxation
References
Abalkin, L.I. (2005). A Vision of tomorrow. Moscow: Institute of Economics Russian Academy of Sciences, 126 p.
Andreff, W. (2004). Who lost Russia? Ekovest, 4, 7-33.
Bobkov, V.N. & Odintsova, Ye.V. (2014). Middle classes: theoretical principles, contemporary working out, regarding the hired workers. Journal of Economics of the region, 2(38), 203-212.
Bobkov, V.N. & Veredyuk, O.V. (2014). Social Vulnerabitity as a Result of Inequality of Living Standards. History The standard of living of the population of regions of Russia, 1, 17 – 26.
Berdnikov, V.A. & Vakhtina, M. A. (2014). Institute of social justice in the market economy in Russia: state and trends. Vestnik of Samara State University of Economics, 11(121), 6-11.
Berdyaev, N.A. (1990). Inequality Philosophy. Moscow: IMA- Press, 285 p.
Bogomolov, O.T. (2007). Moral factor of social and economic development. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 11, 55-62.
Bulgakov, S.N. (1990). Philosophy of Economy. Moscow: Nauka, 412 p.
Habermas, J. (2000). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. St. Peterburg, 380 p.
Economic subjects of post-soviet Russia: ten years later. (2010). In R.M. Nureev (Eds.). Part III. Moscow: Public Science Foundation, 167-168.
Fukuyama, F. (2004). The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Moscow: AST, Ermak, 732 p.
Glazyev, S.Y. (2007). I'm just doing my duty. Moscow: Algorithm, 464 p.
Gorshkov, M.K. (2011). Russian Society as It Is. Moscow: Publishing house: New chronograph, 672p.
Inequality and income. (2015). Levada-center. Direct access: http://www.levada.ru/14-07-2015/neravenstvo-i-dokhody.
Khlebnikov, P. (2001). Godfather of the Kremlin Boris Berezovsky and the looting of Russia. Direct access: http://nationalization.ru/Library/Hlebnikov_P._Kriestniyyi_Otec_Kremlya_.a6.pdf.
Kozlowski, P. (1999). Principles of Ethical Economy. Moscow: Economic School, 344p.
Larsen, E. (2006). Escaping the resource curse and the Dutch disease? American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 3, 605-640.
Ngo, T.W. (2008). Rent-seeking and Economic Governance in the Structural Nexus of Corruption in China. Crime, Law and Social Change, 49, 27-44.
North, D. (2011). Violente and Social Orders. Moscow: Gaidar’s Institute, 480 p.
North, D., Wallis, J. & Vinegast, B. (2012). In the shadow of Violence: Lessons for Companies With Limited Access to political and Economic Activities. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 3, 4-31.
Rich and poor – yesterday and today. (2015). Russian Public Opinion Research Center (RPORC), 2878. Direct access: http://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=115317.
Rawls, J. (2010). A Theory of Justice. Moscow: LKI, 536 p.
Stiglitz, J. (2004). Russian privatization. Approaches and implications. Issues of Economics, 6, 58-75.
Stiglitz, J. (2015). The price of inequality: how today’s divided society endangers our future. Moscow: Eksmo, 508p.
The income distribution in society: government regulation or market mechanism? (2015). Russian Public Opinion Research Center. Direct access: http://wciom.ru/index.php?id=2-36&uid=115143.
Tugan-Baranovsky, M. (1996). To the better Future distribution. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 528 p.
Tullock, G. (2011). Public Goods, redistribution and rent-seeking. Moscow: Gaidar Institute, 281 p.
Vaisburd, V.A., Simonova, M.V., Bogatyreva, I.V., Vanina, E.G. & Zheleznikova, E.P. (2016). Productivity of Labour and Salaries in Russia: Problems and Solutions. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(5), 157-165.