(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 559-570 | DOI: 10.12973/ijese.2016.404a | Article Number: ijese.2016.026
Published Online: April 18, 2016
Abstract
An important stage in any research inquiry is the development of research questions that need to be answered. The strategies to develop research questions should be defined and described, but few studies have considered this process in greater detail. This study explores pre-service science teachers’ research questions and the strategies they can engage in during inquiry. A total of 59 pre-service science teachers who attended an undergraduate Fieldwork Course participated in the study. A single, holistic case study design was used along with an open-ended questionnaire and documents for data collection. The questionnaire was conducted at the end of the course, and documented inquiry reports were analyzed. The results indicate there are 11 methods for defining driving questions. These range from consulting an instructor to group discussion; 21 different strategies can be produced using these methods. These research question defining methods and strategies should be applied as a coding scheme for future studies and expanded. Any research question defining strategies unfamiliar to pre-service science teachers, such as field trips, brainstorming, and concept maps, should then be taught.
Keywords: inquiry, driving question defining strategies, pre-service science teachers.
References
Apedoe, X. S., Ellefson, M. R., & Schunn, C., D. (2012). Learning together while designing: Does group size make a difference? Journal of Science Education and Technology 21, 83-94.doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9284-5
Ay, Ş. (2013). Trainee teachers' views on project-based learning and traditional education. Hacettepe University Journal of Education 28(1), 53-67.
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project- based learning: sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist 26(3 & 4), 369–398.
Bulunuz, M. (2011). Evaluation of pre-service elementary science teachers’ experiences with science projects. Journal of Turkish Science Education 8(4), 74-85.
Burgaz, B., & Erdem, E. (2006). The evaluation of students' skills of discerning ill-structured problems in scenarios during the problem-based learning process. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 24, 66-76.
Colley, K. (2008). Project based science instruction: A primer, an introduction and learning cycle for implementing project-based science. The Science Teacher 75(8), 23-28.
Colley, K. E. (2006). Understanding ecology content knowledge and acquiring science process skills through project-based science instruction. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas 43(1), 26-33.
Creswell, J., W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five approaches. USA: Sage Publications.
Ennis, R. H. (1985). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational Leadership 43(2), 44-48.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research & Development 48(4), 63-85.
Katz, L., & Chard, S. C. (2000). Engaging children's minds: the project approach. USA: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Kisiel, J. (2006). More than lions and tigers and bears, creating meaningful field trip lessons. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas 43(2), 7-10.
Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 483–497.
Marshall, J. A., Petrosino, A. J., & Martin, T. (2010). Preservice teachers’ conceptions and enactments of project-based instruction. Journal of Science Education and Technology 19. 370-386. doi:10.1007/s10956-010-9206-y
Robinson, J. K. (2013). Project-based learning: improving student engagement and performance in the laboratory. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 405, 7-13. doi: 10.1007/s00216-012-6473-x
Rye, J., Landenberger, R., &Warner, T. A. (2013). Incorporating concept mapping in project-based learning: Lessons from watershed investigations. Journal of Science Education and Technology 22, 379-392. doi:10.10007/s10956-012-9400-1
Singer, J., Marx, R. W., & Krajcik, J. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist 35(3), 165-178.
Stefanou, C., Stolk, J. D., Prince, M., Chen, J. C., & Lord, S. M. (2013). Self-regulation and autonomy in problem-and project-based learning environments. Active Learning in Higher Education 14, 109-22. doi: 10.1177/1469787413481132
Toh, K. A., Ho, B. T., Wan, Y. K., & Ang, D. (2006) Science teachers’ perceptions: similarities and differences in the U.S., England, Singapore and Japan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 24, 1-11. doi: 10.1080/0218879040240102
Tortop, H. S., & Özek, N. (2013). The meaningful field trip in project based learning; the solar energy and its usage areas topic. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 44, 300-307.
Yang, Y. C. (2015). Virtual CEOs: A blended approach to digital gaming for enhancing higher order thinking and academic achievement among vocational high school students, Computers & Education, 81, 281-295. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.004
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research design and methods., USA: Sage Publications.