(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 8491-8506 | Article Number: ijese.2016.644
Published Online: October 06, 2016
Abstract
The aim of this research is to determine the effects of various teaching methods and activities, which are used in environmental education lessons, on the environmental literacy level of classroom pre-service teachers. This study was carried out including the classroom pre-service teachers, who took the environmental education course in the academic year of 2012-2013. In this study, an experimental design was used. The Environmental Literacy Scale and the Evaluation of the Environmental Education Outcome Scale, which was developed by the researchers, were utilized as data collection instruments. The implementations were carried out throughout the semester. During the semester, traditional teaching methods (lecture type) were used in the control group, while teaching methods in which the pre-service teachers were active in the outdoor and indoor were used in the experimental group. Regarding the quantitative data, descriptive analysis, paired-samples t-test, Independent Samples T-Test analysis were utilized. Content analysis was used for the analysis of the data obtained from the open-ended questions. The findings showed that there was a statistically significant difference in favor of the experimental group with respect to the “attitudes”, “uses,” and “concern” dimensions of the environmental literacy. When the pre-test and post-test results of the control group were compared within the group, no any significant difference was found. Yet, a significant difference in the dimensions of “attitudes” and “uses” was found when the pre-test and the post-test results were compared within the experimental group. The classroom pre-service teachers in the control group gave very positive feedback on the issues of “the outcomes they obtained from the environmental education course”, “teaching topics related to environmental education when become teachers,” and “environmental problems.” Richer codes and higher frequencies were obtained from the experimental group on these categories.
Keywords: Environmental education, environmental literacy, classroom pre-service teachers, teaching methods, outdoor education
References
Ballantyne, R. and Packer, J. (2005). Promoting environmentally sustainable attitudes and behaviour through free-choice learning experiences: what’s the state of the game, Environmental Education Research, 11(30), 21-35.
Balkan Kiyici, F., Atabek Yigit, E. & Selcen Darcin, E. (2014). Investigation of Pre-Service Teacher’s Opinion and Environmental Literacy Level Change with Nature Education, Trakya University Journal of Education, 4(1), 17-27.
Black, R. (2013) Delivering formal outdoor learning in protected areas: a case study of Scottish Natural Heritage National Nature Reserves. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 22(1), 4-22.
CELP. (2005). The Canadian Environmental Literacy Project (CELP). Annual Report
Chawla, L. & Cushing, D., F. (2007). Education for strategic environmental behavior. Environmental Education Research.Vol. 13. No. 4. pp. 437–452.
Erdogan, M. (2009). Fifth Grade Students’ Environmental Literacy and The Factors Affecting Students’ Environmentally Responsible Behaviors. The Graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle East Technical University. http://tez2.yok.gov.tr/ Retrieved in 31.12.2012.
Erentay, N. & Erdogan, M. (2009). 22 adımda doğa eğitimi. METU Press: Ankara
Erginoz Evren, E. (1999). Çevre Bilimi ve Eğitimi Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul Üniversitesi, Deniz Bilimleri ve İşletmesi Enstitüsü, Deniz Politikası Anabilim Dalı.
Eroglu, B. (2009). Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Küresel Isınma Hakkındaki Bilgi Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Ankara.
Fensham, P. (1979). Educating a community for its environmental situations, in: 1980 plus: community, participation and learning (Book 4) (Melbourne, Australian Association for Community Education and Planning Services Division of the Education Department of Victoria).
Fien, J. (1993). Education for the environment: critical curriculum theorizing and environmental education, Geelong, Deakin University Press
Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
Kaplowitz M. D., ve Levine R. (2005). How environmental knowledge measures up at a Big Ten university. Environmental Education Research, 11(2), 143–160.
Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Nobel Yayınevi. Ankara.
McKeown, R. (2002). Progress has been made in education for sustainable development. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 1, 21–23.
Moody G., Alkaff H., Garrison D., & Golley F. (2005). Assessing the environmental literacy requirement at the University of Georgia. The Journal of Environmental Education, 36(4), 3-9.
MSU-WATER (2001-2006). Social Assessment: Stakeholder Attitudes, Beliefs, and Uses of Water Resources, co-PI M.Kaplowitz and S. Witter Vice President of Finance and Operations, Michigan State University.
Palmberg, I., & Kuru, J. (2000) Outdoor activities as a basis for environmental responsibility. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31, 32-38.
Ozaner, F. S. (2004). “Türkiye’de okul dışı çevre eğitimi ne durumda ve neler yapılmalı?” V. Ulusal Ekoloji ve Çevre Kongresi, 67-98, İzmir.
Sustainable Development Education Panel (2003) Learning to last.
Teksoz, G., Sahin, E., & Ertepinar, H. (2010)-a. Envıronmental Literacy, Pre-Service Teachers, and a Sustainable Future. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education) 39: 307-320 .
Teksoz, G., Sahin, E. & Ertepinar, H. (2010)-b. A new vision for chemistry education students: Environmental education. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education 5(2), 131-149.
Thomas, I. & Nicita, J. (2002). Sustainability education and Australian universities. Environmental Education Research, 8(4), 475-492.
Tuncer, G., Tekkaya, C., Sungur, S., Çakıroğlu, J., Ertepınar, H. & Kaplowitz, M. (2009). Assessing pre-service teachers’ environmental literacy in Turkey as a mean to develop teacher education programs. International Journal of Educational Development 29, 426–436.
UNESCO UNEP (1977). Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education organized by Unesco in co-operation with UNEP Tbilisi (USSR) 74- 26 October 1977.
Uzun, F.V. & Keles, O. (2012) The effects of nature education project on the environmental awareness and behavior. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2912–2916.
Wright. T. S. A. (2002). Definitions and framework for environmental sustainability in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 3(3), 203-220.
Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.