This paper aims to explore how the use of lesson study approach with a constructivist framework could enhance Year 9 students’ conceptions of pressure specifically on the topic of manometer reading in determining gas pressure. A diagnostic test was first administered to three Year 10 classes to help teachers identify student difficulties in learning the topic. Four cycles of lesson study was carried out on four classes, three from one school and an additional confirmatory cycle conducted in a class from a different school. Four tests of pre-, post, delayed and confirmatory were conducted in order to identify students’ misconceptions and their conceptual understanding. The results of the study showed that with the use of the improved lesson design positive progress were achieved on the understanding of pressure to assist the reading of manometers to determine gas pressure.

Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32).

Basca, B., & Grotzer, T. A. (2001). Focusing on the nature of causality in a unit of pressure: How does it affect student understanding? Retrieved from http://shc.ncue.edu.tw/data/misconception/focusingonthenatureofcausality

Cerbin, W., & Kopp, B. (2006). Lesson Study as a model for building pedagogical knowledge and improving teaching. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18(3), 250-257

Clough, E., & Driver, R. (1985). What do children understand about pressure in fluids. Research in Science & Technological Education, 3(2), 133-144.

de Berg, K. C. (1995). Student understanding of the volume, mass, and pressure of air within a sealed syringe in different states of compression. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(8), 871-884.

Dudley, P. (2008). Lesson study in England: from school networks to national policy. Presented at the World Association of Lesson Studies Annual Conference, Hong Kong Institute of Education.

Dudley, P. (2011). How Lesson Study orchestrates key features of teacher knowledge and teacher learning to create profound changes in professional practice. Presented at the World Association of Lesson Studies Annual Conference, Tokyo.

Glasersfeld, E. von (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Falmer Press: London.

Grotzer, T. A. (2004). Putting science within reach. Principal Leadership, 5(2), 16-21.

Haithcock, F. (2010). Lesson study for District and School Leadership Teams in Differentiated Accountability Schools. Retrieved from http://www.flbsi.org/pdf/Lesson%20Study%20TAG_Final.pdf

Klein, M. (1999). The construction of agency in mathematics teacher education programs: A poststructuralist analysis. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 1, 84-93.

Leong, S. S. M., Perera, J. S. H. Q., & Shahrill, M. (2015). Identifying the gaps in students’ understanding of manometer reading. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4 S1), 27-34.

Lewis, C. (2008). Lesson study: A handbook of teacher- led instructional improvement. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools, Inc.

Maier, S. (2004). Misconception Researchand Piagetian Models of Intelligence. Paper presented at the Oklahoma Higher Education Teaching and Learning Conference.

Martin, R., Sexton, C., & Gerlovich, J. (2002). Teaching Science for all Children: Methods for Constructing Understanding. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Matussin, H. S. H. H., Abdullah, N. A., & Shahrill, M. (2015). Integrating ICT and learning study in teaching conversion of travel graphs. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 23(4), 25-39.

Mazur, E. (2003). Understanding or memorization: Are we teaching the right thing?  Retrieved from http://physics.org%2Fsdsu_per%2Farticles%2FMazurpubs_89.pdf&ei=jd53Ud7QNqeyiQe03ICYDg&usg=AFQjCNEhe9h8jIPKVniCWA5YF4K67vDq8g

McClelland, J. (1987). Pressure points. Physics Education, 22(4), 107-109.

Ministry of Education. (2013). The National Education System for the 21st Century: SPN21 (Revised ed.). Ministry of Education, Brunei Darussalam.

Ornek, F., Robinson, W. R., & Haugan, M. P. (2008). What makes physics difficult? International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 3(1), 30-34.

Pathare, S., & Pradhan H. C. (2011). Students’ Alternative Conceptions in Pressure, Heat and Temperature. Retrieved from http://www.hbcse.tifr.res.in/episteme/episteme-1/allabs/shir

Perkins, D.N., & Grotzer, T.A. (2000). Models and moves: Focusing on dimensions of causal complexity to achieve deeper scientific understanding. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

Powel, K. C., & Kalina, C. J. (2009). Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing tools for an effective classroom. Education, 130(2), 241-250.

Resnick, M. (1996). Beyond the centralized mindset. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(1), 1- 22.

Rollnick, M., & Rutherford, M. (1993). The use of a conceptual change model and mixed language strategy for remediating misconceptions on air pressure. International Journal of Science Education. 15(4), 363-381.

Schmidt, W., McKnight, C., & Raizen, S. (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of US mathematics and science education. Kluwer: Dordrecht.

Shepardson, D., & Moje, E. (1994). The impact of a science demonstration on children's understandings of air pressure. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(3), 243-258.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

Smith, C., Carey, S., & Wiser, M. (1985). On differentiation: A case study of the concepts of size, weight, and density. Cognition, 21, 177-237.

Smith, C., Maclin, D., Grosslight, L., & Davis, H. (1997). Teaching for understanding: A study of students’ preinstruction theories of matter and a comparison of the effectiveness of two approaches to teaching about matter and density. Cognition and Instruction, 15(30) 317- 393.

Smith, C., Snir, J., & Grosslight, L. (1992). Using conceptual models to facilitate conceptual change: The case of weight-density differentiation. Cognition and Instruction, 9(3), 221- 283.

Staples, M. E. (2008). Promoting student collaboration in a detracked, heterogeneous secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(5), 349-371.

Steffe, L. P., & Gale, J. (1995). Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Suhaili, A. S., Shahrill, M., & Khalid, M. (2014). The impact of lesson study on primary mathematics teachers’ instructions in Brunei Darussalam. In I. Sahin, S. A. Kiray, & S. Alan (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Education in Mathematics, Science & Technology (pp. 197-201). Konya, Turkey: Necmettin Erbakan University.

Suhaili, H. A. S. H., Shahrill, M., Yusof, J., & Khalid, M. (2016). The Impact of the Different Stages of Lesson Study on Teachers’ Learning: The Bruneian Context. In T. Ueyama (Ed.), The Lesson Study Seminar and Practice 2014: Reflection on the Lesson Study Practice in Brunei Darussalam (pp. 113-120). Brunei Darussalam: Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah Institute of Education, Universiti Brunei Darussalam.

Takahashi, A., & Yoshida, M. (2004). How can we start lesson study?: Ideas for establishing lesson study communities. Teaching Children Mathematics, 10(9), 436-443.

Thompson, F. (2006). An exploration of common student misconceptions in science. International Education Journal, 7(4), 553-559.

Tillman, L. C. (2002). Culturally sensitive research approaches: An African American perspective. Educational Researcher, 31(9), 3–12.

Tyler, R. T. (1998). Children's conceptions of air pressure: Exploring the nature of conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 20(8), 929-958.

Wood, T. (1995). From alternative epistemologies to practice in education: Rethinking what it means to teach and learn. In L. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Zirbel, E. L. (2006). Teaching to promote deep understanding and instigate conceptual change. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 38, 1220-1244.