(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 535-542 | DOI: 10.12973/ijese.2016.406a | Article Number: ijese.2016.024
Published Online: April 18, 2016
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to determine science student teachers’ level of knowledge about the anatomical structure of two sensory organs, the eye and the ear, in addition to vision and hearing processes. Conducted with 86 science student teachers, research utilized drawing methods and open-ended questions as data collection instruments. The results showed that when science student teachers’ answers with regard to vision and its structures compared with their answers concerning hearing and its structures, their success rate was higher for hearing and its structures. Even though students were sufficiently informed about the anatomical structures constituting eyes and ears, it was observed that a significant percentage of the students were incompetent with regard to their understanding of how seeing and hearing takes place and correctly showing the anatomical structures constituting both eyes and ears on a schema. Human organ/organ system education may contribute to an increase in teaching capacity.
Keywords: ear, eye, vision, hearing, student teachers’ ideas.
References
Abdullah, A., Scaife, J. (1997). Using inteviews to assess children’s understanding of science concepts. School Science Review 78, 79-84.
Bahar, M. (2003). Misconceptions in Biology Education and Conceptual Change Strategies. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 3, 27-64.
Bahar, M., Johnstone, A. H., Sutcliffe, R. G. (1999). Investigation of students’ cognitive structure in elementary genetics through word association tests. Journal of Biological Education 33, 134-142.
Bahar, M., Ozel, M., Prokop, P., Usak, M. (2008). Science student teachers’ ideas of the heart. J Baltic Sci Edu 7, 78-85.
Barras, R. (1984). Some misconceptions and misunderstandings perpetuated by teachers and textbooks of biology. Journal of Biological Education 18, 201-206.
Bowker, R. (2007). Children’s perceptions and learning about tropical rainforests: An analysis of their drawings. Environ Edu Res 13, 75-96.
Cepni, S., Tas, E., Kose, S. (2006). The effects of computer-assisted material on students’ cognitive levels, misconceptions and attitudes towards science. Comp Edu, 46, 192-205.
Collis, K. F., Jones, B. L., Sprod, B. L., Watson, F. M., Fraser, S. P. (1998). Mapping development in students’ understanding of vision using cognitive structural model. International Journal of Science Education 20, 45-66.
Dove, J. E., Everett, L. A., Preece, P. F. W. (1999). Exploring a hydrological concept through children’s drawings. International Journal of Science Education 21, 485-497.
Eisen, Y., Stavy, R. (1988). Students’ understanding of photosynthesis. The American Biology Teacher 50, 208-212.
Flores, F., Tovar, M., Gallegos, L. (2003). Representation of the cell and its processes in high school students: An integrated view. Int J Sci Edu 25, 269-286.
Gellert, E. (1962). Children’s conceptions of the content and functions of the human body. Genetic Psychology Monographs 65, 293-405.
Hazel, E., Prosser, M. (1994). First-year üniversity students’ understanding of photosynthesis, their study strategies and learning context. The American Biology Teacher 56, 274-279.
Johnson, C. N., Wellman, H. M. (1982). Children’s developing conceptions of the mind and brain. Child Development 53, 222–234.
Kose, S. (2008). Diagnosing student misconceptions: Using drawings as a research method. World Appl Sci J 3, 283-293.
Kunt, H. (2013). Investigation of Science Student Teachers Knowledge of Human Internal Organs. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology 14(3 A), 1362-1371.
Leach, J., Driver, R., Scott, P., Wood-Robinson, C. (1995). Children’s ideas about ecology 1: Theoretical background, design and methodology. International Journal of Science Education 17, 721-732.
Lewis, J., Wood-Robinson, C. (2000). Genes, chromosomes, cell division and inheritance - do students see any relationship? Int J Sci Edu 22, 177-195.
Marbach-Ad, G., Stavy, R. (2000). Students cellular and molecular explanations of genetic phenomena. J Bio Edu 34, 200-205.
Martlew, M., Connolly, K. (1996). Human figüre drawings by schooled and unschooled children in Papua New Guinea. Children Development 67, 2743-2762.
Maskill, R., Cachapuz, A. F. C. (1989). Learning about the chemistry topic of equilibrium: The use of word association tests to detect developing conceptualizations. International Journal of Science Education 11, 57-69.
Mazens, K., Lautrey, J. (2003). Conceptual change in physics: children’s naive representations of sound. Cognitive Development 115, 1-18
Nagy, M. (1953). Children’s conceptions of some bodily functions. Journal of Genetic Psychology 83, 199-216.
Osborne, R. J., Cosgrove, M. M. (1983). Children’s conceptions of the changes of state of water. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 20, 825-838.
Prokop, P., Fančovičova, J. (2006). Students’ ideas about the human body: Do they really draw what they know? Journal of Baltic Science Education 2, 86-95.
Prokop, P., Prokop, M., Tunnicliffe, S. D., Diran, C. (2007). Children’s ideas of animals’ internal structures. Journal of Biological Education 41, 62-67.
Pridmore, P., Bendelow, G. (1995). Images of health: exploring beliefs of children using the ‘draw-and-write’ technique. Health Education Journal 54, 473-488.
Rennie, L. J., Jarvis, T. (1995). Children’s choice of drawings to communicate their ideas about technology. Research in Science Education 25, 239-252.
Reiss, M. J., Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2001). Students’ understandings of human organs and organ systems. Research in Science Education 31, 383-399.
Reiss, M. J., Tunnicliffe, S. D., Andersen, A. M., Bartoszeck, A., et al. (2002). An international study of young peoples’ drawings of what is inside themselves. Journal of Biological Education 36, 58-64.
Riemeier, T., Gropengießer, H. (2008). On the roots of difficulties in learning about cell division: Process-based analysis of students’ conceptual development in teaching experiments. Int J Sci Edu 30, 923-939.
Rowlands, M. (2004). What do children think happens to the food they eat? Journal of Biological Education 38, 167-171.
Sanders, M. (1993). Erroneous ideas about respiration: The teacher factor. J Res Sci Teaching 30, 919-934.
Teixeira, F. M. (2000). What happens to the food we eat? Children’s conceptions of the structure and function of the digestive system. International Journal of Science Education 22, 507-520.
Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2004). Where does the drink go? Primary Science Review 85: 8-10.
Tunnicliffe, S. D., Reiss, M. J. (1999a). Students’ understanding about animal skeletons. International Journal of Science Education 21, 1187–1200.
Tekkaya, C. (2003). Remediating high schools’ misconceptions concerning diffusion and osmosis through concept mapping and conceptual change text. Res Sci Technol Edu 21, 5-16.
Usak, M. (2005). Prospective elementary science teachers? Pedagogical content knowledge about flowering plants. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., Novak, D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In DL Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan pp. 177-210
White, R., Gunstone, R. (2000). Probing Understanding. London, Falmer Press.
Yesilyurt, S., Kara, Y. (2007). The effects of tutorial and edutainment software programs on students’ achievements, misconceptions and attitudes towards biology on the cell division issue. J. Baltic Sci Edu 6, 5-15.