(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 8335-8342 | Article Number: ijese.2016.631
Published Online: October 04, 2016
Abstract
Physical education significantly contributes to students’ well-being; therefore, it is an instructional priority for California schools and an integral part of our students’ educational experience. High-quality physical education instruction contributes to good health, develops fundamental and advanced motor skills, improves students’ self-confidence, and provides opportunities for increased levels of physical fitness that are associated with high academic achievement. Mastering fundamental movement skills at an early age establishes a foundation that facilitates further motor skill acquisition and gives students increased capacity for a lifetime of successful and enjoyable physical activity experiences. Similarly, the patterns of physical activity acquired during childhood and adolescence are likely to be maintained throughout one’s life span, providing physical, mental, and social benefits. The purpose of this study was to look at the development of knowledge of student physical education teachers in Kazakhstan. Results showed that knowledge important to develop, knowledge developed and knowledge which still needs to be developed at the end of the course was all related to content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge which they could apply in the immediate practical teaching situation. The results are discussed in relation to the development of student physical education teachers knowledge for teaching.
Keywords: Knowledge for teaching, student physical education teachers
References
Anderson, D. (1989). The Discipline and the Profession. Foundations of Canadian Physical Education, Recreation, and Sports Studies. Dubuque: Wm. C. Brown Publishers, 356 p.
Balasagun U. (2004) Kazakhstan, Almaty:Kazakh Enciclopedy. 650 p.
Calderhead, J. and Shorrock, S. B. (1997). Understanding teacher education, London: Falmer Press. 253 p.
Dzu, U. (2002). Rozporządzenie Ministra Edukacji Narodowej i Sportu z dnia 12 lutego 2002 r. w sprawie ramowych planów nauczania w szkołach publicznych." Internetowy System Aktów Prawnych, 47 p.
Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: a study of practical knowledge. New York: Nichols Publishing, 263 p.
Fernandez-Balboa, J. M., Barrett, K., Solomon, M. & Silverman, S. (1996). Perspectives on content knowledge in physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 67, 54-57
Graber, K. (1995). The influence of teacher education programs on the beliefs of student teachers general pedagogical knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and teacher education course work. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 14, 157-718
Griffin, L., Dodds, P. & Rovegno, I. (1996). Pedagogical content knowledge for teachers. Integrate everything you know to help students learn. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 67, 58-61.
Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press, 163 p.
Grossman, P. L., Wilson, S. M. & Shulman, L. E. (1989). Teachers of substance: subject matter knowledge for teaching. In M.C.Reynolds (Eds.). Knowledge Base for the Beginning Teacher. New York: Pergamon, 432 p.
Hebeish, A. & El-Rafie, M. H. (1990) American Dyestuff. Reporter, 79(7), 34-46.
Hopkins, D. (2002). A teacher’s guide to classroom research. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 312 p.
Hoyle, E. & John, P. (1995). Professional knowledge and professional practice. London: Cassell. 273 p.
Leinhardt, G. & Smith, D. (1985). Expertise in mathematics instruction: Subject matter knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 241-271.
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. In G.W. Lewin (Eds.). Resolving Social Conflicts: Selected Papers on Group Dynamic.New York: Harper, 352 p.
McDiarmid, G. W., Ball, D. L. & Anderson, C. W. (1989). Why staying one chapter ahead doesn‟t really work: subject specific pedagogy. In: M.C. Reynolds (Eds.). Knowledge Base for the Beginning Teacher. New York: Pergamon, 256 p.
Pangrazi, R. P. (2007) "Dynamic Physical Education for Elementary School Children". London: Pearson, 758 p.
Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. London: Ashgate, 351 p.
Schwab, J.J. (1964). The structure of the disciplines: Meanings and significance. In: Ford, G. and Purgo, L. (Eds.). The Structure of Knowledge and the Curriculum. Chicago: Rand McNally, 174 p.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of a new reform. Harvard Review, 57, 1-22
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann, 263 p.
Wang, L., Myers, D., & Yanes, M. (2010). Creating student-centered learning experience through the assistance of high-end technology in physical education. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37(4), 352-356.
Woods, M., Karp, G., Goc, H. & Perlman, D. (2008). Physical educators' usage. Physical Educator, 65(2), 82-94.