(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 8163-8181 | Article Number: ijese.2016.618
Published Online: October 04, 2016
Abstract
The relevance of the present research stems from the need to consider the ways of preventing conflicts between the objective necessity of development of students’ creative activity in the learning process, and insufficient development of pedagogical conditions for its effective implementation in theoretical and methodological terms. The article is aimed at summarizing the study of creativity development by means of the foreign language. A set of methods was used in the paper: theoretical (analysis of the philosophical and methodological literature on the issue; projecting), empirical (questionnaires, interviews, testing, an experiment), methods of mathematical statistics. Experimental work covered in total 58 students and included three stages: summative, formative and controlling. The results of the experiment show that the system of exercises developed for boosting the student’s creativity proved out effective, and the selected indicators characterizing the creative activity of students reflect considerable growth. The authors also proved that the goal of foreign language teaching in higher education is both practical knowledge of the target language, and the development of the student personality. The practical significance of this research involves developing the complex of effective means, forms and methods of teaching and learning activities of students in the process of learning a foreign language in the framework of the theory of development training, and the use of the materials received in the course of study by teachers in the higher and secondary vocational schools.
Keywords: Creative tasks, creativity, education, foreign language teaching, fostering creativity, personal development
References
Adobe Systems Incorporated. (2012). Creativity and education: why it matters. Direct access: http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pdfs/Adobe_Creativity_and_ Education_ Why_ It_Matters _study.pdf
Anderson, C. (1962). Technology in American Educations, 1650-1900. Washington: U.S. Government printing office, 363 p.
Ausubel, D. P. (1978). The Nature and Measurement of Creativity. Psychologia, 21, 326-336.
Barysheva, T. A. & Zhigalov, Yu. A. (2006). Psychological and pedagogical basis for creativity development. St.Petersburg: Peter, 452 p.
Barysheva, T. A. (2012). Psychological Structure of Creativity: Invariants and Variations. Direct access: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/psihologicheskaya-struktura-kreativnosti-opyt-empiricheskogo-issledovaniya
Cimermanova, I. (2014). Foreign language teaching and creativity. Direct access: https://www.pulib.sk/web/kniznica/elpub/dokument/Germuskova2/subor/Cimermanova.pdf
Clarke, M. A. (2015). Creativity in modern foreign languages teaching and learning. Direct access: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resource/creativity-modern-foreign-languages-teaching-and-learning
Creativity in the English language classroom (2015). In Alan Maley and Nik Peachey (Eds.). Direct access: http://englishagenda.britishcouncil.org/sites/ec/files/F004_ELT_Creativity_ FINAL_ v2%20WEB.pdf
De Bono, E. (2007). How to have creative ideas: 62 exercises to develop the mind. Vermilion: Autumn, 352 p.
Derkach, A. A. (1991). Pedagogical Heuristics. Moscow: Nauka, 293 p.
Fromm, E. (1959). The creative attitude. New York: Harper & Row, 511 p.
Gordon, W. J. (1961). Synectics: the development of creative capacity. New York: Harper & Row, 427 p.
Guilford, J. P. (1973). Creative Learning. Educational Leadership, 5(48), 363-375.
Ilyin, Ye. P. (2012). Psychology of art, creativity and talent. St.Petersburg: Peter, 355 p.
Livingston, L. (2010). Teaching Creativity in Higher Education. Arts Education Policy Review, 111(2), 59 – 62.
Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination. New York: Scribner, 522 p.
Ostroumova, O. F., Nizamieva, L. R. & Nazarova, G. I. (2014). The didactic aspect of foreign language creative teaching. Journal of Language and Literature, 5(3), 76-82.
Sadykova, A. & Kayumova, D. (2014). The Correlation between Linguistic and Conceptual Worldviews: the Role of Metaphor. Life Science Journal, 11(6), 552-555.
Shatilov, S. F., Kolkova, M. K. & Kolesnikova, I. L. (1991). Methodology of foreign language teaching on the initial stage at school and higher school. St.Petersburg: Obrazovanie, 405 p.
Taylor, I. E. (1977). Can creativity be taught? Critique and Commentary. Social Education, 33(2), 114-125.
Torrance, E. P. (1959). Dictionary of Education. In Carter V.G ,and Winifred R.M. (Eds.). New York: Mc.Graw-Hill, 387 p.