(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 141-150 | DOI: 10.12973/ijese.2016.298a | Article Number: ijese.2016.022
Published Online: March 03, 2016
Abstract
The relevance of the research problem of the modern school student’s subjectivity is caused by the necessity to develop in a growing person the integrity of innovative features such as productive independence, being active and initiative in any case. The aim of this article is to describe pedagogical conditions of students’ subjectivity formation as a process of awareness of their needs in knowledge and transforming themselves and the world and achieving significant personal and social goals of education. The main method of research was the pedagogical experiment, during the process of which the innovative teaching of school students of different ages was organized in the educational organizations of different kinds and type. The main results of the study are the following: clarification of the concept " student’s subjectivity development ", identifying of six groups of pedagogical conditions, proof of their influence on the level of the students’ subjectivity increasing (the level of potential subjectivity, the level of the modus manifestation of subjectivity, the level of attributive manifestation of subjectivity). The article will be useful for scientists investigating problems of modern education, and practitioners seeking to improve the quality of the educational process.
Keywords: school student’s subjectivity of the student, the levels of subjectivity, pedagogical conditions of formation of the school student’s subjectivity
References
Coffield, F. (2004) Should we be using learning styles? What research has to say to practice. Retrieved by June 10, 2014, from http://www.lsrc.ac.uk/publications
Dryden, G., & Voye, D. (2003). Revolution in training. To teach to study the world in a new way. Moscow: PARVINE.
Friedman, T. (2006). Flat world: short history XXI centuries. Moscow: Keeper.
Gallyamova, А. А. (2014). On the technology of development of stu-dents’ subjectivity. Obrazovanie i samorazvitie, 4(42),95-99.
Gromova, C. R. & Alimbekov, A. (2015). Egocentrism and Development of Students Identity (On the Example of Studying of Future Teachers). International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10 (4), 571-578.
Kalimullin, A. M. & Gabdulkhakov, V. F. (2013). Diversification of education and new model of training of teachers.Obrazovanie i samorazvitie, 4(38), 3-8.
Katashev, V. G. & Skobeltsina, Ye. G. (2012). Personal self-actualization as an outcome of cognitive activity in secondary school. Obrazovanie i samorazvitie, 4(32), 9-13.
Lemov, D. (2014). Skill of the teacher. The checked techniques of outstanding teachers. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber.
Leontiev, A. (1999) Lectures on general psychology. Moscow: Smysl.
Martsinkovskaya, T. (2013). Development of the person in social space. In A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Sergeenko (Ed.), Proceeding of the of the international conference "The person, the subject, the personality in the modern psychology" (p. 125-128). Moscow, Russian Federation: Institute of psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Masalimova, A. R., Zakirova, V. G., Chernova, Y. A., Drovnikov, A. S., Shaidullina, A. R. & Sakhieva, R. G. (2014). Structure and content of mentors psychological and pedagogical training curriculum. Life Science Journal, 11(7s), 381-386.
Maslou, A. (2002). Distant limits of human mentality. St. Petersburg: Eurasia.
Moiseyev, N. (1998). Parting with simplicity. Moscow: Agraffe.
Nasibullov, R. R., Kashapova, L .M. & Shavaliyeva, Z. Sh. (2015). Conditions of Formation of Social Successfulness of Students with Disabilities in the System of Continuous Inclusive Education on the Basis of Value Approach. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10 (4), 543-552.
Nikoshkova, E. (2010). The English-Russian dictionary on psychology. Moscow: ABBYY Press.
Novikov, A. (2010). About a pedagogics subject. Pedagogics, 6, 8-14.
Petty, G. (2010). Modern training. Practical guidance. Moscow: Clematises.
Rubinstein, S. (1997) The man and the world. Moscow: Science.
Selivanova, O (2014). The pupil as the subject of his educational activity. European science review, 9(10), 80-82.
The concept of the Federal target program of a development of education on 2016-2020. (2015). Retrieved by June 1, 2015, from http://www.consultant.ru/document/ cons_doc_LAW_173677/? frame=1
Vedishenkova, M. V., Efimova, E. V. & Ryabova, E. V. (2015). Student’s Research Work as the Condition of Continuity of General and Professional Education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10 (4), 533-542.