(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 7703-7714 | Article Number: ijese.2016.604
Published Online: October 03, 2016
Abstract
The importance of the studied problem is caused by the USA’s leading role in the development of modern world order and the economy, its influence in the international economic organizations. The article is aimed at revealing the reasons of choosing neoliberal strategy for Russian reforms, the amount and results of the American financial and technical aid to these reforms. The leading approach of researching this problem is the complex one. It allows finding out economic, internal political, geopolitical and cultural factors which influenced the implementation and the results of the American assistance to the Russian reforms. Authors draw a conclusion about considerable influence of the USA on domestic policy of Russia in the early nineties of the XX century. The amount and the content of the American financial and technical assistance to the Russian government are analyzed. Promises of massive financial aid from the international economic organizations and the USA were realized partially and much later, than it was necessary for economic transformations. The article’s content and conclusions can be used in other scientific works on American-Russian relations history, Modern history of Russia, during elaboration the effective strategy of reforms for the countries which are in a condition of a transitional economy
Keywords: US-Russian relations, american advisers, economic reforms, neoliberal strategy, aid programs
References
Aslund A. (2002) Building Capitalism: the Transformation of the former Soviet Block. Cambridge, Cambridge Press, 75 p.
Batalov, A. Ya. & Kremenyuk, V. A. (2002). Russia and the USA: Rivals or Partners? SShA, Kanada: Economika. Politika. Kultura, 6, 19-36.
Bogdanov, I. Y. (2015). Assessment and evolution of poverty in modern russia. Vestnik of Samara State University of Economics, 3. 158.
Cohen, St. (2000). Failed Crusade: America and the Tragedy of Post-Communist Russia. New York, London: Norton. 304p.
Cox, M. (2000). From the Cold War to Strategic Partnership? US-Russian Relations since the End of the USSR. In M. Boker, C. Ross (Eds.). Russia after the Cold War. London: Longman, 335 p.
Crock, S. (1999). Washington Is Making It Hard For Russia to Help Itself. The Business Week, February 8, 57-58.
Gaidar, Y. (1996). Days of Defeat and Victory. Moscow: Vagrius, 365 p.
Getting Russia Right. The West needs to take a new hard look. (1995). The Economist, 14, 23-25.
Goldman, M. I. (2003). The Piratization of Russia. Russian reform goes awry. London, New York: Routledge, 297 p.
Joint Statement on United States-Russia Economic Initiative. March 21, 1997. (1998). Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States, Washington, D.C., 345 p.
Lapskii, V. (1999). Itak, Primakov v Vashingtone. Rossiiskaya Gazeta, 4, 24-26.
Nye, J. S. (2002). The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t Go It Alone. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 240 p.
Papp, D. (1997). Contemporary International Relations. Frameworks for Understanding. Boston: Pearson,560 p.
Republican Foreign Policy Gurus Attack the Administration’s Competence. (1996). The Washington Post, April 7, 34-35.
Russia CRS Report: IB92089. (2001). Direct access: http: // digital library. unt.edu /govdocs/crs/permalink/meta-crs-1754:1
Russia CRS Report. RL33407 (2006). Direct access: http: // digital library. unt.edu /govdocs/crs/permalink/meta-crs-1823:1
The Economist Russia. (1993). Hard Pounding. The Economist, 337N7811, 28-36.
Russia’s Election: What does it Mean? (1996). Hearing before the Comission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, 104th Congress, 2nd Session, July 10? Washington: Government Printing Office, 84 p.
Rutland, P. (2012). Neoloberalism and the Russian Transition, Review of International Political Economy, 23. 278-284.
Sachs, J.D. (1997). When Foreign Aid Makes Difference. The New York Times, 3, 17-19.
Shakleina, T. A. (2006). Russia and the USA in World Politics. Economika. Politika. Kultura, 9, 3-18.
Shenin, S. Y. (2010). Sachs and American aid to the post-soviet Russia:the case of “different anatomy”, Izvestiya of Saratov University. History. International Relations, 10(1). 99-107.
Shenin, S. Yu. (2008a). Return to Russia. Strategy and Policy of the American Help. St.Petersburg: Philological Faculty of St. Petersburg State University. 335p.
Shenin, S. Yu. (2008b). The Harvard’s «Russian Project»: from Triumph to Disgrace. Izvestiya of Saratov University. History. International Relations, 8(2). 27-33.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its Discontents. London: Penguin Books. 145p.
Talbott, S. (2002). The Russia Hand. A Memoir of Presidential Diplomacy. NewYork: Random House, 512 p.
The Economy of Member Countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States in 1991. (1992). Moscow: Information and publishing center of Goskomstat, 33p.
United States General Accounting Office. (2000). Foreign Assistance International Efforts to aid Russia’s Transition Have Had Mixed Results. Washington: 165p.
Utkin, A. I. (2003). The American Empire. Eksmo: Moscow. 736p.