(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 7608-7626 | Article Number: ijese.2016.597
Published Online: October 03, 2016
Abstract
The relevance of the research problem is inspired by the need to ensure decent work principles in Russia. The purpose of this article is to develop evaluation methodologies and identify areas to implement key principles of decent work at the regional level in modern Russia. A leading approach to study this problem is the development of a new method of calculating the index characterizing the decent work deficit in the region. Results: the authors have developed a general procedure for overcoming the decent work deficit, given the chosen model of development in the regions, and developed the stages of events. In the study, the authors analyzed the existing approaches to the assessment of decent work, taking into account the updated development trends of the economy, its key parameters. There are presented results of a comparative analysis on decent work deficits at the regional level, identified the problem field of assessment methodology and proposed measures to ensure patterns of decent work with regard to the choice of innovative development in regional economies. The advantage of this model is overcoming the decent work deficit through structural, institutional changes, increasing investment activity. The article may be useful for research organizations and regional administrative structures in the development of medium and long-term programs to increase decent work levels.
Keywords: Decent work, wages, labor productivity, social protection, working conditions
References
Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011). Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings. Handbook of Labor Economics, 1, 1043-1171.
Anker, R., Chernyshev, I., Egger, P., Mehran, F. & Ritter, J. A. (2003).Measuring decent work with statistical indicators.International Labour Review, 142(2), 147-178.
Ashmarina, S. I., Zotova, A. S. & Smolina, E. S. (2016). Implementation of financial sustainability in organizations through valuation of financial leverage effect in Russian practice of financial management. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11 (10), 3775 – 3782.
Baimurzina, G. R. (2010). Opportunities and challenges indication of decent work indicators in the regions of Russia. The Standard of Living of the Population of Regions of Russia, 8, 43-56.
Bescond, D., Châtaignier, A., & Mehran, F. (2003). Seven indicators to measure decent work: An international comparison.International Labour Review, 142(2), 179-212.
Bonnet, F., Figueiredo, J. B., & Standing, G. (2003). A family of decent work indexes. International Labour Review, 142(2), 213-238.
Breau, S., Kogler, D. F., & Bolton, K. C. (2014). On the Relationship between Innovation and Wage Inequality: New Evidence from Canadian Cities. Economic Geography, 90(4), 351-373.
Florida, R., Mellander, C., Stolarick, K., & Ross, A. (2011).Cities, skills and wages. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(2), 355-377.
Goos, M., Manning, A., & Salomons, A. (2009).Job Polarization in Europe. American Economic Review, 99(2), 58-63.
Holmlund, B. (2014). What do labor market institutions do? Labour Economics, 30, 62-69.
Jahan, S. (2015). Human Report development in 2015 "Work for the sake of human development" Direct access: http://hdr.undp.org/
Karpuhin, D. N. (2014). Achieving decent work in creating and upgrading jobs. Moscow: IE RAN, 100 p.
Pavlova, E. A., & Sankova, L. V. (2012). Methodological approaches to the definition of decent work index at the power plants. Modern problems of science and education. Direct access: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=5950
Rubery, J., Keizer, A., & Grimshaw, D. (2016). Flexibility bites back: The multiple and hidden costs of flexible employment policies. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(3), 235-251.
Ryan, A. M., & Wessel, J. L. (2015). Implications of a changing workforce and workplace for justice perceptions and expectations.Human Resource Management Review, 25(2), 162-175.
Shaimardanov, N., Polkova, T., & Shahova, O. (2009). Decent work: Methodology and methods of evaluation. , 4, 193-199. The Economy of the Region, 4, 193-199.
Simonova, M. V., Bazhutkina, L. P., & Berdnikov, V. A. (2015).Approaches to the System Salary Increase in the Region on the Ground of Labor Production Growth. Review of European Studies RES, 7(2), 58-65.
Smirnova, T. (2010). The criteria of decent work for intellectual workers. Bulletin of Moscow University, 3, 90-99.
Tatarkin, A., Vasilyeva, E. & Chichkanov, V. (2015). Map selection of life quality control mechanism in the region. Regional Economy: Theory and Practice, 42(417), 2-14.
Zubarevich, N. (2015). Monitoring the crisis and post-crisis development of Russian regions. Direct access: from http://www.socpol.ru/atlas/overviews/social_sphere/kris.shtml