Mythorealistic Concept of ‘Beautiful Lady’ in the Structure of the Author’s Identity (Based on the Diaries of Alexander Blok)

APA 6th edition
In-text: (Minets, 2016)
Your Bibliography: Minets, D. (2016). Mythorealistic Concept of ‘Beautiful Lady’ in the Structure of the Author’s Identity (Based on the Diaries of Alexander Blok). International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(15), 7465-7475.

Harvard
In-text: (Minets, 2016)
Your Bibliography: Minets, D. (2016). Mythorealistic Concept of ‘Beautiful Lady’ in the Structure of the Author’s Identity (Based on the Diaries of Alexander Blok). International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(15), pp. 7465-7475.

Chicago 16th edition
In-text: (Minets 2016)
Your Bibliography: Minets, Diana (2016). "Mythorealistic Concept of ‘Beautiful Lady’ in the Structure of the Author’s Identity (Based on the Diaries of Alexander Blok)". International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 11 (15):7465-7475.

Abstract

The present paper deals with the diaries of Alexander Blok dated 1901-1921 reflecting the process of the writer’s self-identification. During 20 years under the influence of various social and cultural situations Blok’s ‘Self-Conception’ is undergoing significant changes. The vector of these changes shows the complicated evolution of the Author’s ‘Self’. So purpose of the work is to explore the development of Bloks self-identification. The base of the author’s personal identity in the text is comprised of such conceptual dominants as ‘Beautiful Lady’, ‘Art’ (‘Creativeness’), ‘Intelligentsia’, where the first dominant, being the base of the creative life strategy, performs a hyperonymic function which also defines the attitude towards the others. The model of the author’s identity is defined by the following divergent communicative vectors: 1) Self/She, Self/Others as a marker of the positional social abstraction of Blok (individual => group => ontological oppositions); 2) Self/Alter Ego as a marker of reflective autocommunication; 3) Self/We as a marker of group self-categorization. This work represents not only an analysis of the Bloks creation, but also reflects the realities of the contemporary state of literary art and its influence on the poet

Keywords: Social and personal identity, auto-document, diary, creative life strategy, concept

References

Licuk, Zh. V. (2012). The Silver Age of Russian Poetry in the Memoirs and Autobiographies of the Contemporaries. Social Sciences, 3(106), 112-126.

Minets, D. V. (2012). The Concepts of Identity in the ‘Svodnye tetradi’ by Marina Tsvetayeva. Kazan science, 2, 178-183.

Schneider, L. B. (2007). Personal, Gender and Professional Identity: Theory and Methods of Diagnostics. Moskow: MPSI, 128 p.

Shlykova, Ju. B. (2006). Personal Comprehension of Meaning of Life: PhD Abstract. Krasnodar: KGU, 56 p.

Solovyev, I. (1971). Alexander Blok: Introduction. Moskow, 363 p.

Tarasova, I. V. & Minec, D. V. (2016). Lexical and Semantical Transformations of the Image of Lyubov Mendeleeva in the Diaries of Alexander Blok. Materials of the international scientific conference. Vologda, Russia: Vologda State University, 583-584.

Turner, J. (1985). Social Categorization and Self-concept: A Social Cognitive Theory of Group Behavior. Advances in Group Processes, 3, 77-121.

Zvonareva, Ju. V. (2013). Linguistic Means of Personal Identification in Literature: PhD Abstract. Cheljabinsk: ChGU, 70 p.