(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 7431-7440 | Article Number: ijese.2016.583
Published Online: October 02, 2016
Abstract
Relevance of the study lies in the fact that modern higher education in the Russian Federation are increasingly approaching the critical state – despite attempts to reform and use of successful foreign practices, our country is still lagging behind in the role. The aim of the article is the formation on the events that occurred in the country over the past two decades, the conclusion that Russia is characterized by unpredictable "rules of the game" and, as a consequence, the future unpredictable. The leading method of research is the modelling method, Indication, and prognostic methods. Identified prospects that Russian society is developing in a legalized falsification of higher education is reflected in the media and formally legalized the issuance of diplomas of higher education to persons not mastered the full competencies, required not only educational standards, but also the labor market. The significance of the results obtained might be expressed as follows: Indicators of Education falsification are "custom-made" evaluation and qualification works of students. Plagiarism, rough compilation when writing papers, the active use of cribs in the control of knowledge of students is a systemic phenomenon in the modern high school, that is, in fact, the falsification of knowledge. Thus, in today's society formed the "cult of the diploma" the presence of higher education, and not the real competence, with the help of which the professional career and the life of a citizen in a civilized world.
Keywords: Eurasian Economic Union, higher education, corruption, competence, prevention of corruption
References
Abramov, R.A. (2015). Integration of Russian and Belorussian universities as a form of access to modern higher education. Higher Education in Russia, 10, 68-74.
Abramov, R.A., Sokolov M. (2016). Features of counteraction to corruption in the Russian educational system. In R.A. Abramov (Ed.), Organizational and administrative mechanism of anti-corruption activities (Russian and foreign experience): collection of articles and abstracts of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference on January 25, 2016 (pp. 10-14). Moscow, Russian Federation: "ID Tretyakov" LLC.
Aklin, M., Bayer, P., Harish, S.P., Urpelainen, J. (2014). Who blames corruption for the poor enforcement of environmental laws? Survey evidence from Brazil. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 16(3), 241-262.
Becker, K., Hauser, C., Kronthaler, F. (2013). Fostering management education to deter corruption: What do students know about corruption and its legal consequences? Crime, Law and Social Change, 60(2), 227-240.
Beets, S.D. (2005). Understanding the demand-side issues of international corruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(1), 65-81.
Croix, D., Delavallade, C. (2009). Growth, public investment and corruption with failing institutions. Economics of Governance, 1, 10-187.
Delavallade, C. (2006). Corruption and distribution of public spending in developing countries. Journal of Economics and Finance, 30(2), 222-239.
Eicher, T., García-Peñalosa, C., Ypersele, T. (2009). Education, corruption, and the distribution of income. Journal of Economic Growth, 14(3), 205-231.
Factor, R., Kang, M. (2015). Corruption and population health outcomes: an analysis of data from 133 countries using structural equation modeling. International Journal of Public Health, 60(6), 633-641.
Gomez, M.L. (2000). Civic formation towards a culture of lawfulness: School-based education against crime and corruption. Trends in Organized Crime, 5(3), 86-89.
LaMagna, R.C. (1999). Changing a culture of corruption: How Hong Kong’s independent commission against corruption succeeded in furthering a culture of lawfulness. Trends in Organized Crime, 5(1), 121-137.
Osipian, A.L. (2009). Vouchers, tests, loans, privatization: Will they help tackle corruption in Russian higher education? PROSPECTS, 3, 39-47.
Riera, P., Barberá, P., Gómez, R., Mayoral, J.A., Montero, J.R. (2013). The electoral consequences of corruption scandals in Spain. Crime, Law and Social Change, 60(5), 515-534.
Sokolov, M.S. (2016). Theoretical and applied aspects of combating corruption: Russian and foreign experience. Security Issues, 1, 15-26.
Spector, B.I. (2016). The benefits of anti-corruption programming: implications for low to lower middle income countries. Crime, Law and Social Change, 65(4), 423-442.
Vernadsky, V.I. (1991). Scientific thought as a planetary phenomenon. Moscow: Nauka, 270 p.
Walker, D.W. (2016). How Systemic inquiry releases citizen knowledge to reform schools: Community scorecard case studies. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 29(4), 313-334.
Wilhelm, P.G. (2002). International validation of the corruption perceptions index: Implications for business ethics and entrepreneurship education. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(3), 177-189.
Wing, L.T. (1998). Pioneer of moral education: Independent comission against corruption (ICAC). Trends in Organized Crime, 4(2), 19-30.
Wood, P. (2010). Earth worms: The eco-corruption of higher education. LAW, 23(1), 11-19.
Wu, Y., Zhu, J. (2016). When are people unhappy? Corruption experience, environment, and life satisfaction in Mainland China. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(3), 1125-1147.
Zhou, L., Tao, J. (2009). Government size, market-orientation and regional corruption: Evidence from the provincial level panel data. Frontiers of Economics in China, 4(3), 425-448.