The article is devoted to the description of peculiarities of a person, language and culture. The offered approach of studying the human factor in the language singles out implicit connotations and makes it possible to see the differences in the perception of the reality by the members of the nation. The idea of the language as an environment of the existence of a person with which the constant interconnection happens; the person being the center of the linguistic picture of the world as the beginning of all categorical coordinates of the language is considered to be the basic idea. Studies of dramatic dialogue as discourse, as a special speech exchange system, are hardly in evidence, even in research of the language of drama. In drama discourse dialogue is employed as a dramatic resource. The specifics of the drama dialogue arc the locus of this study. The dialogue is viewed as interaction open to enormous variation. Dialogue is operative in drama; speech functioning is complex with its own specificities which are different from those in the literary field.

Beckerman, B. (1970). The Dynamics of Drama. New York: Knopf, 274 p.

Berdyaev, N. A. (1990). Self-knowledge. Moscow: International relations, 278 p.

Berezin, F. M. & Golovin B. N. (1979). General linguistics. Moscow: Education, 374 p.

Brutyan, G. A. (1968). Hypothesis of Sapir-Whorf. Yerevan: Luís, 472 p.

Buneeva, E. S. (1996). Conceptological Model of a Sign of a Seniority. Language Personality: Cultural Concepts. Volgograd: Peremena, 273 p.

Burns, E. (1972). Theatricality: A Study of Convention in the Theatre and in Social Life. London: Longman, 361 p.

Dibrova, E. I. (1996). Text Phenomena: Cultural, Philological, and Psychophilological. Philologica, 10, 2-5.

Dubichinsky, V. V. (1993). Lexical parallels. Moscow: Self-knowledge, 155 p.

Gachev, G. D. (1988). National Images of the World. Moscow: Soviet Writer, 209 p.

Hall, E. (1973). The Silent Language. New York: Garden City, 277 p.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviours, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. London: SAGE Publications, 285 p.

Hymes, D. (1998). Models of the Interaction of Language and Social Life. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 363 p.

Kasevich, V. B. (1991). Language and knowledge. Language and Structure of Knowledge. Moscow: Institute of Linguistics of Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 251 p.

Kluckhohn, С. (1951). Values and Value Orientations in the Theory of Action. Toward а General Theory of Action. Cambridge: CUP, 352 p.

Kukushkina, E. I. (1984). Knowledge, Language, Culture. Moscow: Moscow State University, 153 p.

Lakoff, R. T. (2000). The Language War. London: University of California Press, 263 p.

Leontyev, A. A. (1976). Signs of Integrity and Connectivity of the Text. Semantic perception of the Speech Message. Moscow: Moscow State University, 274 p.

Markaryan, E. S. (1969). Sketches of the Theory of Culture. Moscow: Thought, 367 p.

Ojegov S. I. & Shvedova, N. I. (1994): Explanatory Dictionary of Russian. Moscow: Russian, 274 p.

Romaine, S. (1994). Language in Society: An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: OUP. 396 p.

Rosen, E. V. (1991). German Lexicon: History and Present. Moscow: The higher school, 285 p.

Thelia, V. N. (1996). Russian Phraseology. Moscow: Languages of the Russian Culture, 253 p.

Trudgill, P. (1996). Sociolinguistics: An Introduction to Language and Society. New York: OUP, 305 p.

Ufimtseva, N. V. (1995). Russians in Eyes of Russians. Language – System. Language – Text. Language – Ability. Moscow: Institute of Linguistics of Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 242-249.

Wardhaugh, R. (1997). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: OUP, 473 p.

Williams, R. (1983). Keywords. A vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: OUP, 373 p.

Zheltukhina M. R. (2015). Institutional, Stereotypical and Mythological Media Markers of Modern Society. Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia, April, 12 (1), 913-920.

Zheltukhina, M. R., Krasavsky, N. A., Slyshkin, G. G. & Ponomarenko, E. B. (2016a). Utilitarian and Aesthetic Values in the Modern German Society. IEJME-Mathematics Education, 11(5), 1411-1418.

Zheltukhina, M. R., Vikulova, L. G., Slyshkin, G. G. & Vasileva, E. G. (2016b). Naming as Instrument of Strengthening of the Dynastic Power in the early middle Ages. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(14), 7195-7205.

Zinkovskaya, A. V., Tkhorik, V. I. & Fanyan N. Yu. (2007). Language – Spirituality – Culture. Krasnodar: Education-South, 363 p.