The paper examines the characteristics of a mistake of the commitment of crime as an optional feature of the mental state of the crime. The analysis conducted offers an opportunity to state that in international criminal law, a mistake of law, although taken into account, does not generally affect the classification of crime. We uncovered and substantiated the need to research mistake as one of the features of the mental state of crime. This will make it possible to reveal the real causes of crime and administer the right type and measure of punishment. Moreover, the research provides a definition of mistake of criminal law by which we should understand an incorrect view of a person of the actual substance of his/her action and the specific characteristic of social relations that are protected by criminal law and are damaged as a result of a crime. Proceeding from a scientific approach to the definition of mistake of criminal law and its role in the mental state of corpus delicti, the author proposes that mistakes of law and mistakes of fact in criminal law affect the classification of crimes.

Abdilov, K. S., Zusbaev, B. T., Naurysbaev, E. A., Nukiev, B. A., Nurkina, Z. B., Myrzahanov, E. N. & Urazalinc, G. T. (2016). Basis of Criminalistic Classification of a Person in Republic Kazakhstan and Republic Mongolia. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(11), 4751-4759.

Akutaev, R. & Magomedov, G. (2016). On the Crime Object. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(11), 4218-4228.

Annon. (1997). The Criminal Code of the Republic of Poland, dated 06.06.1997. Direct assess: http://www.legislationline.org/download/action/download/id/4286/file/POLAND_CC_am2012_%20PL.pdf.

Annon. (2001). The Criminal Code of Ukraine adopted on April 5, 2001 No 2341-III. Newsletter of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. No. 25-26. Article 131.

Annon. (2010). The Tax Code of Ukraine adopted on December 2, 2010. No. 2755 –VI. Official newsletter of Ukraine, 2010. No 92. – pp. 3248.

Bazhanov, M. I. (1992). Criminal law of Ukraine. General part: lecture notes. Dnepropetrovsk: Bridges.

Chernenko, T. G. (2014). Mistake of fact with regard to the object and subject of an endeavor. Journal of Altai Academy of Economics and Law, 3(35), 126-130.

Davydovych, I. I. (2013). Mistake with regard to the victim and its criminal significance (criminal endevors on representatives of public authorities in connection with the performance of their official or civic duties). Scientific gazette of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 182(1), 306-315.

Fatkullina, M. B. (2011). Mistakes of law and mistakes of fact in criminal law: problems of classification. PhD thesis. Yekaterinburg, Russia, 178 p.

Khavroniuk, M. I. (2006). History of criminal law of European countries. Kyiv: Istyna.

Kirsch, A. (1999). France Mistake of law in French criminal law. Amicus Curiae, 16, 25-28.

Komarov, O. D. (2014). Mistake of fact with regard to modus operandi. 4th Kharkiv conference in criminal law: abstracts of the participants in the scientific conference of undergraduate and postgraduate students (pp. 76-79). Kharkiv.

Kuznetsova, N. F., & Tiazhkova, I. M. (Eds.) (2002). A course in criminal law (Vol. 1. General part. Theories of crime). Moscow: Zertsalo-M publisher.

Larkin, Jr P. J. (2013). A Mistake of Law Defense as a Remedy for Overcriminalization. ABAJ Criminal Justice, 26(1), 10-18.

Meese III, E., & Larkin, Jr P. J. (2012). Reconsidering the Mistake of Law Defense. J. Crim. l. & Criminology, 102, 725–784.

Pakutin, V. D. (2003). The institute of circumstances that rule out the criminality of an act in the legislation of some countries: comparative analysis. In Topical issues of the criminal procedure of contemporary Russia: inter-university collection of scholarly works (pp. 77-84). Ufa. RIO BashSU.

Prus, E. U. (2014). Mistake of law. Concept and characteristics. Contemporary problems of politics, 51, 79-86.

Ptashenko, D. S. (2013). Imaginary defense in criminal law of other countries: specifics of regulation by criminal law and general norms with regard to law. European prospects, 8, 81-86.

Robinson, Paul H., & Grall, Jane A. (1983). Element Analysis in Defining Criminal Liability: The Model Penal Code and Beyond, 35 STAN. L. REv., 681, 726-732.

Segev, R. (2006). Justification, rationality and mistake: Mistake of law is no excuse? It might be a justification! Law and Philosophy, 25(1), 31-79.

Simons, K. W. (1990). Mistake and impossibility, law and fact, and culpability: A speculative essay. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 81, 447-517.

Simons, K. W. (2009). Mistake of Fact or Mistake of Criminal Law? Explaining and Defending the Distinction, 3, Series CRIM. L. & PHIL.

Simons, K. W. (2011). Ignorance and Mistake of Criminal Law, Noncriminal Law, and Fact. Ohio St. J. Crim. L., 9, 487-543.